ZIP 236 is inconsistent with ZIP 237
A GitHub issue on the zcash/zips repository reports an inconsistency between ZIP 236 and ZIP 237. ZIP 236 requires coinbase transactions to claim all available miner subsidy plus fees, while ZIP 237 claims ZIP 236 requires the coinbase to claim its full total input value. The issue states these definitions are inconsistent and that ZIP 236 must be changed.
Radar summary of the original source
An open proposal—not a live product.
Radar found activity on the original proposal source. Open means the source still lists it as open; it does not mean the proposal is approved, merged, or implemented.
- Status
- Open proposal
- Source
- Zcash Improvement Proposals
- Source activity
- Confidence
- Source-linked record
ZIPs
Zcash Improvement Proposals
Radar summary of the original source
Related activity
- Original source
[ZIP 312] Specify key generation, change randomizer handling
Changes to randomizer handling after I realized that it couldn't possibly be generated using the message as an input. It does simplify things too. Some additional fixes (using "Re-Randomized FROST" consistently; updating Owners) fixes #1051 Referenced issue #1051: [ZIP 312] Complete the specification for FROST key generation. This needs to be compatible with quantum resilience.
- Original source
NU7: ZIP 218 rounding lowers the supply cap that ZIP 237 claims to keep
Found by @str4d. ZIP 218 sets the post-NU7 subsidy to floor(MaxBlockSubsidy / (2·3·2^Halving)), so three 25-second blocks pay up to 2 zatoshi less than one 75-second block. ZIP 218 states the resulting shortfall from MAX_MONEY: 0.6720 + (H_3 − A)/10^8 ZEC, of which 0.1848 ZEC predates NU7. ZIP 237 reissues only the NSM Value Balance: pre-NU6 unclaimed value plus removed funds. The rounding loss never enters it, so Mainnet issuance converges to MAX_MONEY minus 67,200,000 + (4,406,400 − A) zatoshi, where A is the NU7 activation height.
- Original source
More NU7 ZIP fixes
Proposal 1403 is tracked from its source repository.